Florida

BNet Metering DInterconnection
  • 2007
  • 2008
  • 2009
  • 2010
  • 2011
  • 2012
  • 2013
  • 2014
  • 2015
  • N/A
  • A
  • A
  • A
  • A
  • B
  • B
  • B
  • B
  • 2007
  • 2008
  • 2009
  • 2010
  • 2011
  • 2012
  • 2013
  • 2014
  • 2015
  • N/A
  • D
  • C
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • D
  • D
  • D

Eligible Renewable/Other Technologies

Solar Thermal Electric, Photovoltaics, Wind, Biomass, Hydroelectric, Geothermal Electric, CHP/Cogeneration, Hydrogen, Small Hydroelectric, Tidal Energy, Wave Energy, Ocean Thermal

Applicable Sectors

Commercial, Industrial, Residential, Nonprofit, Schools, Local Government, State Government, Tribal Government, Fed. Government, Agricultural, Institutional

Applicable Utilities

Investor-owned utilities

System Capacity Limit

2 MW

Aggregate Capacity Limit

No limit specified

Net Excess Generation

Credited to customer's next bill at retail rate; excess reconciled annually at avoided-cost rate

REC Ownership

Customer owns RECs

Meter Aggregation

Not allowed

recommendations

  • N/A

notes

Florida resides in the middle of the pack in terms of the ranking of its net metering policy, tying for 25th on score with a B grade. Floridas net metering policy is somewhat unique in several ways. First, the detailed provisions exist only in the regulations established by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC), as opposed to within the statute. Second, it is the highest scoring state that receives a deduction (-1) for treatment of retail PPAs. Floridas net metering regulations expressly permit leased systems to qualify for net metering, but past PSC decisions indicate that retail PPAs are not permitted generally or allowed to net meter. Finally, while the net metering statute and accompanying regulations do not contain any meaningful safe harbor clauses, another separate portion of Florida law related to the states energy conservation targets does suggest that customers who pursue energy efficiency or on-site generation should be protected from discriminatory rates and rate structures. Unfortunately, the meaning and strength of this clause is somewhat ambiguous, and as a consequence Florida does not receive full points in the safe harbor category.

Eligible Renewable/Other Technologies

Solar Thermal Electric, Photovoltaics, Wind, Biomass, Hydroelectric, Geothermal Electric, CHP/Cogeneration, Hydrogen, Small Hydroelectric, Tidal Energy, Wave Energy, Ocean Thermal

Applicable Sectors

Commercial, Industrial, Residential, Nonprofit, Schools, Local Government, State Government, Tribal Government, Fed. Government, Agricultural, Institutional

Applicable Utilities

Investor-owned utilities

System Capacity Limit

2 MW

Aggregate Capacity Limit

No limit specified

Net Excess Generation

Credited to customer's next bill at retail rate; excess reconciled annually at avoided-cost rate

REC Ownership

Customer owns RECs

Meter Aggregation

Not allowed

recommendations

  • N/A

notes

Florida resides in the middle of the pack in terms of the ranking of its net metering policy, tying for 25th on score with a B grade. Floridas net metering policy is somewhat unique in several ways. First, the detailed provisions exist only in the regulations established by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC), as opposed to within the statute. Second, it is the highest scoring state that receives a deduction (-1) for treatment of retail PPAs. Floridas net metering regulations expressly permit leased systems to qualify for net metering, but past PSC decisions indicate that retail PPAs are not permitted generally or allowed to net meter. Finally, while the net metering statute and accompanying regulations do not contain any meaningful safe harbor clauses, another separate portion of Florida law related to the states energy conservation targets does suggest that customers who pursue energy efficiency or on-site generation should be protected from discriminatory rates and rate structures. Unfortunately, the meaning and strength of this clause is somewhat ambiguous, and as a consequence Florida does not receive full points in the safe harbor category.

Eligible Renewable/Other Technologies

Solar Thermal Electric, Photovoltaics, Landfill Gas, Wind, Biomass, Hydroelectric, Geothermal Electric, CHP/Cogeneration, Hydrogen, Anaerobic Digestion, Small Hydroelectric, Tidal Energy, Wave Energy, Ocean Thermal

Applicable Sectors

Commercial, Industrial, Residential, General Public/Consumer, Nonprofit, Schools, Local Government, State Government, Tribal Government, Fed. Government, Agricultural

Applicable Utilities

Investor-owned utilities

System Capacity Limit

2 MW

Standard Agreement

External disconnect switch requirements waived for inverter-based generators up to at l0 kW

Insurance Requirements

External disconnect switch requirements waived for inverter-based generators up to at l0 kW

External Disconnect Switch

External disconnect switch requirements waived for inverter-based generators up to at l0 kW

Net Metering Required

External disconnect switch requirements waived for inverter-based generators up to at l0 kW

recommendations

  • "Increase covered capacity from 2 MW to 20 MW
  • Remove requirements for redundant external disconnect switch on larger systems
  • Remove requirements for additional insurance on larger systems"

notes

Florida resides in the middle of the pack in terms of the ranking of its net metering policy, tying for 25th on score with a B grade. Floridas net metering policy is somewhat unique in several ways. First, the detailed provisions exist only in the regulations established by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC), as opposed to within the statute. Second, it is the highest scoring state that receives a deduction (-1) for treatment of retail PPAs. Floridas net metering regulations expressly permit leased systems to qualify for net metering, but past PSC decisions indicate that retail PPAs are not permitted generally or allowed to net meter. Finally, while the net metering statute and accompanying regulations do not contain any meaningful safe harbor clauses, another separate portion of Florida law related to the states energy conservation targets does suggest that customers who pursue energy efficiency or on-site generation should be protected from discriminatory rates and rate structures. Unfortunately, the meaning and strength of this clause is somewhat ambiguous, and as a consequence Florida does not receive full points in the safe harbor category.

Eligible Renewable/Other Technologies

Solar Thermal Electric, Photovoltaics, Landfill Gas, Wind, Biomass, Hydroelectric, Geothermal Electric, CHP/Cogeneration, Hydrogen, Anaerobic Digestion, Small Hydroelectric, Tidal Energy, Wave Energy, Ocean Thermal

Applicable Sectors

Commercial, Industrial, Residential, General Public/Consumer, Nonprofit, Schools, Local Government, State Government, Tribal Government, Fed. Government, Agricultural

Applicable Utilities

Investor-owned utilities

System Capacity Limit

2 MW

Bonus

External disconnect switch requirements waived for inverter-based generators up to at l0 kW

recommendations

  • "Increase covered capacity from 2 MW to 20 MW
  • Remove requirements for redundant external disconnect switch on larger systems
  • Remove requirements for additional insurance on larger systems"

notes

Florida resides in the middle of the pack in terms of the ranking of its net metering policy, tying for 25th on score with a B grade. Floridas net metering policy is somewhat unique in several ways. First, the detailed provisions exist only in the regulations established by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC), as opposed to within the statute. Second, it is the highest scoring state that receives a deduction (-1) for treatment of retail PPAs. Floridas net metering regulations expressly permit leased systems to qualify for net metering, but past PSC decisions indicate that retail PPAs are not permitted generally or allowed to net meter. Finally, while the net metering statute and accompanying regulations do not contain any meaningful safe harbor clauses, another separate portion of Florida law related to the states energy conservation targets does suggest that customers who pursue energy efficiency or on-site generation should be protected from discriminatory rates and rate structures. Unfortunately, the meaning and strength of this clause is somewhat ambiguous, and as a consequence Florida does not receive full points in the safe harbor category.